Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte-dot-net.invalid>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.gui
Subject: Re: Is JavaFx better than Swing?
Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2020 02:47:48 +0200
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 9
Message-ID: <rgksnu$6ul$1@dont-email.me>
References: <rgbm3r$fml$1@news.icm.edu.pl> <rgemcc$pb6$1@dont-email.me> <rghhba$i0r$1@news.icm.edu.pl> <rgi4h1$5q9$1@dont-email.me> <rgj4or$uui$1@news.icm.edu.pl>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2020 00:47:58 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="1464f550c9828aed522beebec604f4f6"; logging-data="7125"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19tTsdMzyHvz/fSlBPL7hIQ"
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.9.0
Cancel-Lock: sha1:rgg6h/3Tt2jot6S3RtbG3j9P8NY=
In-Reply-To: <rgj4or$uui$1@news.icm.edu.pl>
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
Content-Language: en-US
X-Antivirus: AVG (VPS 200807-4, 08/07/2020), Outbound message
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.java.gui:5547

On 2020-08-07 10:52, slawek wrote:
> The Java for desktop apps is passe. Mostly due to Oracle
>  decisions. The Swing is old, Fx is oversophisticated and too
>  complicated. There is no real good choice.

Well, looks like you found an answer to your question. Good on you!

-- 
DF.