Path: csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!feeder1.hal-mli.net!news.glorb.com!news-out.readnews.com!transit3.readnews.com!news-out.news.tds.net!newsreading01.news.tds.net!86597e80!not-for-mail From: "Jan Burse" Subject: Re: jTDS, trashes heap wi Message-ID: X-Comment-To: comp.lang.java.databases Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.databases In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=IBM437 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Gateway: time.synchro.net [Synchronet 3.15a-Win32 NewsLink 1.92] Lines: 23 Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2011 15:21:48 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 96.60.20.240 X-Complaints-To: news@tds.net X-Trace: newsreading01.news.tds.net 1303917708 96.60.20.240 (Wed, 27 Apr 2011 10:21:48 CDT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2011 10:21:48 CDT Organization: TDS.net Xref: x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.java.databases:109 To: comp.lang.java.databases Lew schrieb: > Do you have a million calls into the > database in a short time, thus motivating > your optimization concerns? I have approx. 1'000 DB calls per item. And I have ca. 6'000 items. The first version of the batch run around 8 hours. Now I am down to 1 1/2 hours. I am now using a custom memory cache between the DB and the application. Bye --- * Synchronet * The Whitehouse BBS --- whitehouse.hulds.com --- check it out free usenet! --- Synchronet 3.15a-Win32 NewsLink 1.92 Time Warp of the Future BBS - telnet://time.synchro.net:24