Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: minforth Newsgroups: comp.lang.forth Subject: Re: Parsing timestamps? Date: Sat, 5 Jul 2025 14:41:11 +0200 Lines: 10 Message-ID: References: <1f433fabcb4d053d16cbc098dedc6c370608ac01@i2pn2.org> <4d440297d7e17251ebc50774bacfec73e184f9bc@i2pn2.org> <2025Jul5.104922@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: individual.net d1XA7915WTxQ13IN+k4Bhg2irMjx4ITkzYA8HiIQc6XPxkB8C0 Cancel-Lock: sha1:6MwJ4XVfZ3fqLVy6vrWVxW4W/SA= sha256:X4IlCHd5PTcM7OlVNGh2iy7I4Eh7A7Mg0RtRPIdvNvE= User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird In-Reply-To: Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.forth:133973 Am 05.07.2025 um 14:21 schrieb albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl: > I investigated the instruction set, and I found no way to detect > if the 8 registers stack is full. > This would offer the possibility to spill registers to memory only > if it is needed. > IIRC signaling and handling fp-stack overflow is not an easy task. At most, the computer would crash. IOW, spilling makes sense.