Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Paul Rubin Newsgroups: comp.lang.forth Subject: Re: Parsing timestamps? Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2025 15:10:30 -0700 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 14 Message-ID: <87a55dxbft.fsf@nightsong.com> References: <1f433fabcb4d053d16cbc098dedc6c370608ac01@i2pn2.org> <2025Jul2.172222@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> <300ba9a1581bea9a01ab85d5d361e6eaeedbf23a@i2pn2.org> <4d440297d7e17251ebc50774bacfec73e184f9bc@i2pn2.org> <2025Jul5.104922@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> <6fd9f665e73ad93270fff88eca894ba69424cac7@i2pn2.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2025 00:10:31 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="9aa5980888cce665223eb2b8e83d190f"; logging-data="486031"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18S3B8BP30I/o+ZV06Sc5E9" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:FTf/Bp0oZo4zrW7o35YmziFu5dE= sha1:l8r3Q2BX1GBJ8hVyomxafPjr5YM= Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.forth:133994 dxf writes: > As for SSE2 it wouldn't exist if industry didn't consider > double-precision adequate. SSE2 is/was first and foremost a vectorizing extension, and it has been superseded quite a few times, indicating it was never all that adequate. I don't know whether any of its successors support extended precision though. W. Kahan was a big believer in extended precision (that's why the 8087 had it from the start). I believes IEEE specifies both 80 bit and 128 bit formats in addition to 64 bit. The RISC-V spec includes encodings for 128 bit IEEE but I don't know if any RISC-V hardware actually implements it. I think there are some IBM mainframe CPUs that have it.