Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Alexis <flexibeast@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.forth
Subject: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"
Date: Tue, 27 May 2025 22:33:38 +1000
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 14
Message-ID: <875xhmdyhp.fsf@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 27 May 2025 14:33:39 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="a5c25410583675abe8d6ae674d22b2de"; logging-data="2762484"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/MzPjpB9oMEp4/mtkpYCWZOlSiRf1CzlU="
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:CIMrvj3qvaU+OemxwgRgAY44Z/E= sha1:rEWsk08XE3Ioj88/4Rn1ZPsHWw4=
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.forth:133528


Thought this community might be interested in this:

"[Philippe] doesn’t take a strong stance on whether this should
technically qualify as a Forth implementation, given that the base
implementation lacks stacks, dictionaries, and the ability to define
words. However, it does have an outer and inner interpreter, the ability
to compile and execute code, and most importantly, 'the simplicity and
hacky feeling of Forth.'"

-- https://hackaday.com/2025/05/27/a-forth-os-in-46-bytes/


Alexis.