Path: csiph.com!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder3.hal-mli.net!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder1.hal-mli.net!feed.news.qwest.net!mpls-nntp-03.inet.qwest.net!news-out.octanews.net!indigo.octanews.net!auth.brown.octanews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Paul Rubin Newsgroups: comp.lang.forth Subject: Re: doing exercises for starting forth, kinda discouraging, some are easy and some seem text not prepare me for.... References: <2a5baeb8-2c72-41a6-8648-d52842405f18@n16g2000vbn.googlegroups.com> Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2012 12:31:18 -0700 Message-ID: <7xmx2vim49.fsf@ruckus.brouhaha.com> Organization: Nightsong/Fort GNOX User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:aSiDjmKjFfkvflhLMwHLf/m0t24= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Lines: 11 NNTP-Posting-Date: 19 Jul 2012 14:31:25 CDT X-Complaints-To: abuse@octanews.net Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.forth:14179 Andrew Haley writes: > I don't really understand why this is a goal. If your Forth could > build itself, why would you want to build it on some other Forth? To solve the chicken-vs-egg problem, I would have thought. > I dont think I've ever heard of a Forth in Forth that builds itself on > *any* Forth. I remember thinking the cross-compiling proposal for ANS Forth would make this a lot easier.