Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx05.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Paul Rubin Newsgroups: comp.lang.forth Subject: Re: jonesforth: taking up the challenge Date: Tue, 04 Jun 2013 11:28:50 -0700 Organization: Nightsong/Fort GNOX Lines: 7 Message-ID: <7x7gi97msd.fsf@ruckus.brouhaha.com> References: <51ae2e6d$0$26867$e4fe514c@dreader37.news.xs4all.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Injection-Info: mx05.eternal-september.org; posting-host="d94d289a4df6ae47ea4d4f8b2ae808e7"; logging-data="9706"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19D8N2HKDJ45WB+gPww3EgK" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:ZiCBjtlgUJ3O4bMYhWBLecc62d4= sha1:P28VFeBxiGNBEM/w3gTjvmAY+u4= Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.forth:23176 albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) writes: > What do we want? The enticement of jonesforth but > - ISO compatibility (for all words with an ISO name that is) > - no words in assembler if Forth is feasible > - one file, Forth coded in assembler Is that basically what eforth is?