Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.forth > #12961
| From | Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Subject | Re: Hayes Core SEEBUF test - size of data |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.forth |
| References | <jqua9m$mfl$1@speranza.aioe.org> <TpCdnU2_irpsKU_SnZ2dnUVZ_u-dnZ2d@supernews.com> <jqv9bq$opa$1@speranza.aioe.org> <07f94bf6-b412-4200-b9b8-b771dca8d7ae@k5g2000vbf.googlegroups.com> <m5jrqt.p20@spenarnc.xs4all.nl> |
| Message-ID | <57Odndb2B9iGyEXSnZ2dnUVZ8tadnZ2d@supernews.com> (permalink) |
| Date | 2012-06-13 03:53 -0500 |
Albert van der Horst <albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl> wrote: > In article <07f94bf6-b412-4200-b9b8-b771dca8d7ae@k5g2000vbf.googlegroups.com>, > BruceMcF <agila61@netscape.net> wrote: >>On Jun 9, 6:44=A0am, "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_h...@notemailntt.cmm> >>wrote: >>> Ok, so an "address unit" is the machine's address unit, not Forth's CELL. >> >>When you have an address, adding one to it points to the following >>address unit. >> >>It is normally the machine addressing, mostly octet bytes, sometimes >>words on word addressed processors. > > And sometimes in data memory it counts bytes, and in code memory > it counts words. (Atmel). I've never come around checking whether > this violates an unwritten assumption in the ISO standard. No it doesn't, because code memory is not addressable. Andrew.
Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Hayes Core SEEBUF test - size of data "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@notemailntt.cmm> - 2012-06-08 21:53 -0400
Re: Hayes Core SEEBUF test - size of data Doug Hoffman <glidedog@gmail.com> - 2012-06-08 22:07 -0400
Re: Hayes Core SEEBUF test - size of data "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2012-06-08 16:29 -1000
Re: Hayes Core SEEBUF test - size of data "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2012-06-08 17:09 -1000
Re: Hayes Core SEEBUF test - size of data "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@notemailntt.cmm> - 2012-06-09 06:45 -0400
Re: Hayes Core SEEBUF test - size of data "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2012-06-09 06:44 -1000
Re: Hayes Core SEEBUF test - size of data "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@notemailntt.cmm> - 2012-06-11 21:42 -0400
Re: Hayes Core SEEBUF test - size of data "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2012-06-11 17:57 -1000
Re: high-level CMOVE> was [Re: Hayes Core SEEBUF test - size of data] "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@notemailntt.cmm> - 2012-06-12 04:26 -0400
Re: Hayes Core SEEBUF test - size of data Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2012-06-09 22:02 +0200
Re: Hayes Core SEEBUF test - size of data "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@notemailntt.cmm> - 2012-06-09 20:17 -0400
Re: Hayes Core SEEBUF test - size of data Coos Haak <chforth@hccnet.nl> - 2012-06-10 02:34 +0200
Re: Hayes Core SEEBUF test - size of data Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2012-06-10 22:34 +0200
Re: Hayes Core SEEBUF test - size of data "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@notemailntt.cmm> - 2012-06-10 18:18 -0400
Re: Hayes Core SEEBUF test - size of data Coos Haak <chforth@hccnet.nl> - 2012-06-11 02:34 +0200
Re: Hayes Core SEEBUF test - size of data Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2012-06-11 22:16 +0200
Re: Hayes Core SEEBUF test - size of data "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@notemailntt.cmm> - 2012-06-11 20:32 -0400
Re: Hayes Core SEEBUF test - size of data "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2012-06-11 14:55 -1000
Re: Hayes Core SEEBUF test - size of data Josh Grams <josh@qualdan.com> - 2012-06-12 11:01 +0000
Re: Hayes Core SEEBUF test - size of data Alex McDonald <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2012-06-12 04:58 -0700
Re: Hayes Core SEEBUF test - size of data rugxulo@gmail.com - 2012-06-12 08:21 -0700
Re: Hayes Core SEEBUF test - size of data Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2012-06-12 10:55 -0500
Re: Hayes Core SEEBUF test - size of data Alex McDonald <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2012-06-12 09:22 -0700
Re: Hayes Core SEEBUF test - size of data rugxulo@gmail.com - 2012-06-12 11:57 -0700
Re: Hayes Core SEEBUF test - size of data Alex McDonald <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2012-06-12 14:31 -0700
Re: Hayes Core SEEBUF test - size of data rugxulo@gmail.com - 2012-06-12 17:43 -0700
Re: Hayes Core SEEBUF test - size of data Alex McDonald <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2012-06-12 23:41 -0700
Re: Hayes Core SEEBUF test - size of data "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@notemailntt.cmm> - 2012-06-13 00:02 -0400
Re: Hayes Core SEEBUF test - size of data Alex McDonald <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2012-06-12 23:25 -0700
Re: Hayes Core SEEBUF test - size of data "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@notemailnot.cmm> - 2012-06-22 16:50 -0400
Re: Hayes Core SEEBUF test - size of data Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2012-06-23 01:08 +0200
Re: Hayes Core SEEBUF test - size of data rugxulo@gmail.com - 2012-06-24 05:12 -0700
Re: why certain Forth's are easier to use, was [Re: Hayes Core SEEBUF test - size of data] "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@notemailnot.cmm> - 2012-06-24 18:45 -0400
Re: why certain Forth's are easier to use, was [Re: Hayes Core SEEBUF test - size of data] "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2012-06-24 14:03 -1000
Re: Hayes Core SEEBUF test - size of data "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@notemailntt.cmm> - 2012-06-12 23:59 -0400
Re: Hayes Core SEEBUF test - size of data Alex McDonald <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2012-06-12 23:29 -0700
Re: Hayes Core SEEBUF test - size of data Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2012-06-12 22:02 +0200
Re: Hayes Core SEEBUF test - size of data Doug Hoffman <glidedog@gmail.com> - 2012-06-10 05:34 -0400
Re: Hayes Core SEEBUF test - size of data "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@notemailntt.cmm> - 2012-06-09 06:44 -0400
Re: Hayes Core SEEBUF test - size of data BruceMcF <agila61@netscape.net> - 2012-06-12 18:49 -0700
Re: Hayes Core SEEBUF test - size of data Albert van der Horst <albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl> - 2012-06-13 08:32 +0000
Re: Hayes Core SEEBUF test - size of data Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2012-06-13 03:53 -0500
Re: Hayes Core SEEBUF test - size of data anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2012-06-10 11:47 +0000
csiph-web