Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register


Groups > comp.lang.forth > #23879

Re: On the importance of standards

Newsgroups comp.lang.forth
Date 2013-06-23 02:55 -0700
References <e9af6341-c048-459b-b033-0137279c7481@googlegroups.com> <51aded0f.1138518166@news.demon.co.uk> <kolsur$teb$1@online.de>
Message-ID <401fb74a-b24a-41d5-a7a9-baf73d8ad17c@googlegroups.com> (permalink)
Subject Re: On the importance of standards
From glidedog@gmail.com

Show all headers | View raw


On Tuesday, June 4, 2013 7:24:11 PM UTC-4, Bernd Paysan wrote:
> Stephen Pelc wrote:

> > The most 
> > widely ported OOP package appears to be FMS, but it's far 
> > from fashionable among people who talk about Forth OOP.
  
> The most portable OOP package is Mini-OOF, which just runs unchanged on  
> about any Forth you can find, because it uses so few features.  It isn't  
> even considered fashionable by its creator (me), but it hasn't been ported  
> to anything, because it doesn't need porting.

FMS Single Inheritance needs no porting to an ANS Forth yet I
consider it to be full featured (and it has much smaller source
than FMS Multiple Inheritance).
Uploaded 2 days ago:
http://soton.mpeforth.com/flag/fms/index.html

-Doug

Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | Next | Find similar


Thread

Re: On the importance of standards glidedog@gmail.com - 2013-06-23 02:55 -0700

csiph-web