Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > comp.lang.forth > #23879
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.forth |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-06-23 02:55 -0700 |
| References | <e9af6341-c048-459b-b033-0137279c7481@googlegroups.com> <51aded0f.1138518166@news.demon.co.uk> <kolsur$teb$1@online.de> |
| Message-ID | <401fb74a-b24a-41d5-a7a9-baf73d8ad17c@googlegroups.com> (permalink) |
| Subject | Re: On the importance of standards |
| From | glidedog@gmail.com |
On Tuesday, June 4, 2013 7:24:11 PM UTC-4, Bernd Paysan wrote: > Stephen Pelc wrote: > > The most > > widely ported OOP package appears to be FMS, but it's far > > from fashionable among people who talk about Forth OOP. > The most portable OOP package is Mini-OOF, which just runs unchanged on > about any Forth you can find, because it uses so few features. It isn't > even considered fashionable by its creator (me), but it hasn't been ported > to anything, because it doesn't need porting. FMS Single Inheritance needs no porting to an ANS Forth yet I consider it to be full featured (and it has much smaller source than FMS Multiple Inheritance). Uploaded 2 days ago: http://soton.mpeforth.com/flag/fms/index.html -Doug
Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | Next | Find similar
Re: On the importance of standards glidedog@gmail.com - 2013-06-23 02:55 -0700
csiph-web