Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!news.glorb.com!npeer02.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: hwfwguy@gmail.com
Newsgroups: comp.lang.forth
Subject: Re: Which standard?
Date: Tue, 1 May 2012 07:25:00 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 8
Message-ID: <33177042.3000.1335882300972.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@ynff7>
References: <30794f7f396fa9ad7ec52f034288c527@dizum.com> <2012Mar26.110424@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> <m1i7s5.mvv@spenarnc.xs4all.nl> <jl4m35$uqf$1@news.albasani.net> <m1wcxt.5e6@spenarnc.xs4all.nl> <jm19uk$nrl$1@news.albasani.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 72.211.152.81
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1335882301 16112 127.0.0.1 (1 May 2012 14:25:01 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 1 May 2012 14:25:01 +0000 (UTC)
In-Reply-To: <jm19uk$nrl$1@news.albasani.net>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=72.211.152.81; posting-account=6GCGIQoAAAAyO8IjR_VTwqiqLwx0Q_G8
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-Received-Bytes: 1604
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.forth:11801

On Tuesday, April 10, 2012 5:44:04 AM UTC-7, Marc Olschok wrote:
> So would I of course. Perhaps you misunderstood me. I am not against
> having NOT. Not at all. I just want it to behave bitwise as the other
> logical operations in Forth. On should emphasize that C does indeed
> provide to separate versions (bitwise and 0/1) for the other logical
> operators also. So my criticism would not apply there.
> 
What's your opposition to : NOT INVERT ; ?