Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register


Groups > comp.lang.forth > #23747

Re: Trickier sorting

From anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl)
Newsgroups comp.lang.forth
Subject Re: Trickier sorting
Date 2013-06-18 08:03 +0000
Organization Institut fuer Computersprachen, Technische Universitaet Wien
Message-ID <2013Jun18.100338@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> (permalink)
References <kpnsb3$g6d$1@dont-email.me> <kpo4ah$6lg$1@speranza.aioe.org> <gMadncsjDeLdBSLMnZ2dnUVZ_o6dnZ2d@supernews.com>

Show all headers | View raw


Elizabeth D Rather <erather@forth.com> writes:
>On 6/17/2013 1:02 PM, Rod Pemberton wrote:
>...
>> So, B was stack based, used threaded code, had a single data type
>> consisting of a 'cell'.  Sound familiar?  The big noticeable
>> difference is that B looks much like C in terms of syntax.  Forth
>> doesn't.
>
>Well, Forth is based on two stacks, does not necessarily use threaded 
>code, and has quite a few data types, although the compiler doesn't 
>enforce data type rules. I agree that Forth doesn't look at all like 
>either B or C. So, not really much in common at all.

Actually, when you read how Unix and C started, and how Forth started,
they were surprisingly similar in the beginning (certainly surprising
when you look at how different they are today).  Unix started with and
further evolved towards larger machines (with MMUs), while Forth
started with and evolved towards smaller machines.  The division
between OS and language was there in Unix from the start (there were
also two people involved:-), whereas it was not present in Forth until
there were hosted Forths much later.

- anton
-- 
M. Anton Ertl  http://www.complang.tuwien.ac.at/anton/home.html
comp.lang.forth FAQs: http://www.complang.tuwien.ac.at/forth/faq/toc.html
     New standard: http://www.forth200x.org/forth200x.html
   EuroForth 2013: http://www.euroforth.org/ef13/

Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

Trickier sorting "WJ" <w_a_x_man@yahoo.com> - 2013-06-17 20:42 +0000
  Re: Trickier sorting "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@notemailnotq.cpm> - 2013-06-17 19:02 -0400
    Re: Trickier sorting Elizabeth D Rather <erather@forth.com> - 2013-06-17 13:14 -1000
      Re: Trickier sorting anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2013-06-18 08:03 +0000
    Re: Trickier sorting Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-06-18 04:28 -0500
  Re: Trickier sorting Pablo Hugo Reda <pabloreda@gmail.com> - 2013-06-17 16:19 -0700
    Re: Trickier sorting hughaguilar96@yahoo.com - 2013-06-18 17:38 -0700
  Re: Trickier sorting hughaguilar96@yahoo.com - 2013-06-18 17:21 -0700
    Re: Trickier sorting Zbiggy <zbigniew2011REMOVE@gmail.REMOVE.com> - 2013-06-19 13:43 +0000

csiph-web