Path: csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder3.hal-mli.net!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder1.hal-mli.net!npeer03.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: Mark Wills Newsgroups: comp.lang.forth Subject: Re: Readable code and refactoring for optimization Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2011 05:33:26 -0800 (PST) Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 2 Message-ID: <16318476.428.1323783206964.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@vbmi7> References: <4e9b11a0-cc0d-464e-a61c-a7867ffe2bfa@n1g2000yqk.googlegroups.com> <4ee4a216$0$283$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> Reply-To: comp.lang.forth@googlegroups.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 178.97.76.117 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Trace: posting.google.com 1323783286 17958 127.0.0.1 (13 Dec 2011 13:34:46 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2011 13:34:46 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=178.97.76.117; posting-account=W9Y9TgoAAAAe3pS80Z-tHCcq6DoIqBGn User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-Google-Web-Client: true Xref: x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.forth:8031 Would it be true to say that a highly factored ITC program would run slower than an un-factored program (more nesting) but that it aint necessarily so with a native-code generating Forth compiler?