Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > comp.lang.cobol > #12889
| Path | csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!panix!.POSTED.panix2.panix.com!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | docdwarf@panix.com () |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.cobol |
| Subject | Re: Using one 01 in another 01? |
| Date | Wed, 5 Feb 2025 18:51:13 -0000 (UTC) |
| Organization | Public Access Networks Corp. |
| Message-ID | <vo0bv1$pis$1@reader2.panix.com> (permalink) |
| References | <vns0so$1j4ho$1@dont-email.me> <vns4j5$4rl$1@reader2.panix.com> <vnvqid$2cj31$1@dont-email.me> |
| Injection-Date | Wed, 5 Feb 2025 18:51:13 -0000 (UTC) |
| Injection-Info | reader2.panix.com; posting-host="panix2.panix.com:166.84.1.2"; logging-data="26204"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@panix.com" |
| X-Newsreader | trn 4.0-test77 (Sep 1, 2010) |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.cobol:12889 |
Show key headers only | View raw
In article <vnvqid$2cj31$1@dont-email.me>, Bruce Axtens <snetxa@hotmail.com> wrote: [snip] >So what my question was really about was whether one WS value can be >used to define another. It seems not. Not at the 01 level (except in the FILE SECTION). Have you looked into the REDEFINES clause? The 66 RENAMES clause has become so rare it's the mark of either ancient code or 'Look, Ma, I'm a programmer!' code. DD
Back to comp.lang.cobol | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar
Using one 01 in another 01? "Bruce M. Axtens" <some.one@some.where> - 2025-02-04 03:17 +0000
Re: Using one 01 in another 01? docdwarf@panix.com () - 2025-02-04 04:20 +0000
Re: Using one 01 in another 01? Bruce Axtens <snetxa@hotmail.com> - 2025-02-05 21:54 +0800
Re: Using one 01 in another 01? docdwarf@panix.com () - 2025-02-05 18:51 +0000
csiph-web