Path: csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!panix!.POSTED.panix2.panix.com!not-for-mail From: docdwarf@panix.com () Newsgroups: comp.lang.cobol Subject: Re: GnuCOBOL in the press Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2024 00:18:03 -0000 (UTC) Organization: Public Access Networks Corp. Message-ID: References: Injection-Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2024 00:18:03 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: reader1.panix.com; posting-host="panix2.panix.com:166.84.1.2"; logging-data="345"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@panix.com" X-Newsreader: trn 4.0-test77 (Sep 1, 2010) Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.cobol:12869 In article , Robert Doerfler wrote: >docdwarf@panix.com () schrieb: >> In article , >> Bill Gunshannon wrote: >>>On Sat, 16 Mar 2024 12:38:46 -0000 (UTC), docdwarf wrote: >>> >>>> in a skill that >>>> folks decided to stop learning twenty years ago (thanks, Mr Gunshannon!) >>> >>> >>>Let's keep it honest. Folks never said they did not want to learn it. >> >> That might be why I didn't phrase it as 'folks said they didn't want to >> learn it'. My words were 'folks decided to stop learning (it)'. > >When I talk about myself, I often mention that I wanted to learn COBOL. When I talk about myself I am taller, smarter, better-looking, more sharply-dressed, a delight to ladies who recognise this, by instinct, across crowded rooms or great, open, empty spaces. One of us might have something to learn from the other. [snip] >Honestly, I don???t know what >those might be worth, but dealing with z/OS, ISPF, REXX, CICS >and COBOL on an IBM Z Mainframe was great fun though. ;) Here we are in agreement; I found doing such things to be much more enjoyable than working as a delivery-clerk or stirring vats in a factory. DD