Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > comp.lang.c > #125760
| From | Philipp Klaus Krause <pkk@spth.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c |
| Subject | Re: A new benchmark |
| Date | 2018-01-25 15:52 +0100 |
| Organization | solani.org |
| Message-ID | <p4cr0a$l7n$1@solani.org> (permalink) |
| References | <p4cjpp$g2c$1@solani.org> <p4clso$6ea$1@dont-email.me> <p4cn14$ibd$1@solani.org> <4ae644ef-5eb8-4e52-af2a-94895e7d9150@googlegroups.com> |
Am 25.01.2018 um 15:41 schrieb fir: > W dniu czwartek, 25 stycznia 2018 14:45:27 UTC+1 użytkownik Philipp Klaus Krause napisał: >> Am 25.01.2018 um 14:25 schrieb Rick C. Hodgin: >>> >>> How does it work? How do you benchmark an application written in C? >> >> The goal here is to benchmark an implementation (i.e. hardware, >> compiler, standard libary), not an application. Just like most >> benchmarks do. >> > but how it benchmark, some example or description > Like many other benchmarks do: Do some computations in a loop, measure how many loop iterations you can do in a given amount of time. In the case of stdcbench, this is done for each module, then the resulting scores are summed. Currently only the c90base module is complete (I am currently working on the c90lib module). For c90base, the computations done in the loop are * Decompress some data that is compressed via Huffman+RLE. At a lower level, this mostly benchmarks control-flow constructs (including function pointers) and bitwise operations. * Insertion sort. At a lower level, this mostly benchmarks control-flow constructs, indirection and comparisons. * Integer matrix operations. At a lower level, this mostly benchmarks integer multiplications and loops. Philipp
Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
A new benchmark Philipp Klaus Krause <pkk@spth.de> - 2018-01-25 13:50 +0100
Re: A new benchmark "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2018-01-25 08:25 -0500
Re: A new benchmark Philipp Klaus Krause <pkk@spth.de> - 2018-01-25 14:45 +0100
Re: A new benchmark fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2018-01-25 06:41 -0800
Re: A new benchmark Philipp Klaus Krause <pkk@spth.de> - 2018-01-25 15:52 +0100
Re: A new benchmark fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2018-01-25 07:02 -0800
Re: A new benchmark Philipp Klaus Krause <pkk@spth.de> - 2018-01-26 15:22 +0100
Re: A new benchmark bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2018-01-25 16:09 +0000
Re: A new benchmark Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2018-01-25 13:00 -0600
Re: A new benchmark Philipp Klaus Krause <pkk@spth.de> - 2018-01-26 10:14 +0100
Re: A new benchmark Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2018-01-26 10:56 -0600
Re: A new benchmark supercat@casperkitty.com - 2018-01-26 13:07 -0800
Re: A new benchmark Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2018-01-27 13:13 -0600
Re: A new benchmark supercat@casperkitty.com - 2018-01-25 13:42 -0800
Re: A new benchmark Philipp Klaus Krause <pkk@spth.de> - 2018-01-26 11:19 +0100
Re: A new benchmark supercat@casperkitty.com - 2018-01-26 08:17 -0800
csiph-web