Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > comp.lang.c > #396514
| Path | csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!nntp.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c |
| Subject | Re: Loops (was Re: do { quit; } else { }) |
| Date | Wed, 28 Jan 2026 16:42:35 -0800 |
| Organization | None to speak of |
| Lines | 18 |
| Message-ID | <87y0lhb66c.fsf@example.invalid> (permalink) |
| References | <vspbjh$8dvd$1@dont-email.me> <vtin99$vu24$1@dont-email.me> <vtiuf0$18au8$1@dont-email.me> <vtj97r$1i3v3$1@dont-email.me> <vtl166$36p6b$1@dont-email.me> <vtlcg0$3f46a$2@dont-email.me> <20250415153419.00004cf7@yahoo.com> <86h62078i8.fsf@linuxsc.com> <20250504180833.00000906@yahoo.com> <86plggzilx.fsf@linuxsc.com> <vvnsvt$3k1mu$1@dont-email.me> <86ldr4yx0x.fsf@linuxsc.com> <vvpmm2$3dhl$1@dont-email.me> <vvpsji$4jht$1@dont-email.me> <vvr5mg$l85c$1@dont-email.me> <87wmam4xa5.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> <868qn2zl1m.fsf@linuxsc.com> <vvrs5j$t9go$1@dont-email.me> <86o6vyxoit.fsf@linuxsc.com> <87zffi2n7j.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> <86tsw5k4h1.fsf@linuxsc.com> |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain |
| Injection-Date | Thu, 29 Jan 2026 00:42:36 +0000 (UTC) |
| Injection-Info | dont-email.me; posting-host="097a326c6bda6fd0bedb2054f6a63ebb"; logging-data="975059"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/QNaNDkTsjToA+rwTVqSQL" |
| User-Agent | Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:mX/wYO7k4ns/rE/DnVxXY6Hx1HE= sha1:ZNBsxC/4QI7fg3nbIuDQMoQW1d0= |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.c:396514 |
Show key headers only | View raw
Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> writes:
> Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> writes:
>> Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> writes:
[...]
>> In my opinion, keeping a function's definition and declarations
>> consistent is absolutely worth it, even if the language might not
>> require it.
>
> Without some sort of accompanying rationale, this unadorned
> statement of opinion conveys no useful information.
I posted an opinion, clearly marked as my opinion. More than
eight months later, you felt the need to post a followup vaguely
expressing your opinion on my opinion.
--
Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com
void Void(void) { Void(); } /* The recursive call of the void */
Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Re: Loops (was Re: do { quit; } else { }) Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2026-01-28 09:54 -0800
Re: Loops (was Re: do { quit; } else { }) Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2026-01-28 16:42 -0800
Re: Loops (was Re: do { quit; } else { }) Tristan Wibberley <tristan.wibberley+netnews2@alumni.manchester.ac.uk> - 2026-01-31 07:03 +0000
Re: Loops (was Re: do { quit; } else { }) Tristan Wibberley <tristan.wibberley+netnews2@alumni.manchester.ac.uk> - 2026-01-31 03:53 +0000
Re: Loops (was Re: do { quit; } else { }) Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2026-01-31 18:26 +0200
Re: Loops (was Re: do { quit; } else { }) scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2026-01-31 18:33 +0000
Re: Loops (was Re: do { quit; } else { }) Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2026-01-31 21:02 +0200
csiph-web