Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: technology discussion =?utf-8?Q?=E2=86=92?= does the world need a "new" C ?
Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2024 09:54:46 -0700
Organization: None to speak of
Lines: 34
Message-ID: <87sewesg89.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com>
References: <v66eci$2qeee$1@dont-email.me> <877cdur1z9.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <v6joi4$1epoj$1@dont-email.me> <871q42qy33.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <v6k6i0$1h4d3$1@dont-email.me> <87ed82p28y.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <v6m03l$1tf05$1@dont-email.me> <87r0c1nzjj.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <v6m716$1urj4$1@dont-email.me> <87ikxconq4.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <v6n8iu$24af0$1@dont-email.me> <20240711115418.00001cdf@yahoo.com> <v6oamt$2d8nn$1@dont-email.me> <v6oct4$2djgq$2@dont-email.me> <v6of96$2ekb0$1@dont-email.me> <v6ovfc$2hcpf$1@dont-email.me> <v6p4hf$2icph$1@dont-email.me> <v6qgpu$2t6p7$3@dont-email.me> <v6r33m$30grj$1@dont-email.me> <v6r3iv$30gru$1@dont-email.me> <20240712045301.394@kylheku.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Injection-Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2024 18:54:50 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="f6a4ae00b1d1f7396bcd7741519ff487"; logging-data="3282208"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18flEPzVKk1WkNapBEjVju5"
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:o+fiLOMKAZBdeV8079N8BjewxmM= sha1:w5dUZIzU2Anf30yUnVyRBzKkQdU=
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.c:387104

Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> writes:
> On 2024-07-12, bart <bc@freeuk.com> wrote:
>> It's clearly not by value. It's apparently not by reference. You can't 
>> get away with saying they are not passed, as clearly functions *can* 
>> access array data via parameters.
>
> Actually, you probably can get away with saying that it is "passed
> by reference".
>
> The formal term that doesn't apply is "call by reference"; that's what
> C doesn't have.
>
> "call by reference" emphasizes that the function call mechanism
> provides the reference semantics for a formal parameter, not that some
> arbitrary means of passage of the data has reference semantics.
[...]

I know that "call by reference" is the usual formal term, but I
personally prefer "pass by reference".

The terms "call by reference" and "call by value" emphasize the call,
implying that all arguments in a given call are passed with the same
mechanism.  In some languages that's true (C argument passing is purely
by value, and Fortran, as I understand it, is purely by reference), but
in others (C++, Pascal, Ada) you can select by-value or by-reference for
each parameter.  "Pass by (reference|value)" feels more precise.

I haven't checked, but I suspect the terms "call by (reference|value)"
predate languages that allowed the mechanism to be specified for each
parameter.

-- 
Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com
void Void(void) { Void(); } /* The recursive call of the void */