Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: encapsulating directory operations
Date: Tue, 20 May 2025 16:22:18 -0700
Organization: None to speak of
Lines: 14
Message-ID: <87plg2zx3p.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com>
References: <100h650$23r5l$1@dont-email.me> <20250520065158.709@kylheku.com> <100i2la$292le$1@dont-email.me> <87a5770xjw.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> <100j09o$2f04b$1@dont-email.me> <100j232$2fb3a$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Injection-Date: Wed, 21 May 2025 01:22:19 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="151d526d8f9bb67aa0331e0f184aea14"; logging-data="2602719"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19x7jLCRkq6H/krhgMufT7i"
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:iqxAO3WgK8BFTE4cfuuu+Fceb1s= sha1:D9gpBTkvYlyEmG/1T509bngEbhc=
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.c:393470

"Paul Edwards" <mutazilah@gmail.com> writes:
[...]
> And I am not personally familiar with the philosophy of
> language standards.

Because there's no such thing, nor does there need to be.  Different
languages are designed by different people with different goals and
motivations.  I doubt that anyone here can tell you anything useful
about how your personal language should be defined.  You can do whatever
you like.

-- 
Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com
void Void(void) { Void(); } /* The recursive call of the void */