Path: csiph.com!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Ben Bacarisse Newsgroups: comp.lang.c Subject: Re: bart again (UCX64) Date: Tue, 05 Sep 2023 01:33:52 +0100 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 20 Message-ID: <87o7ihsbkf.fsf@bsb.me.uk> References: <871qfiknil.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <87v8ctkbsj.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <20230901115322.184@kylheku.com> <20230901133548.87@kylheku.com> <20230901150200.880@kylheku.com> <8734zvxra0.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <87pm2yvg0m.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <20a53e7c-6952-432e-8147-9004ab5ea79cn@googlegroups.com> <8734ztvrqi.fsf@bsb.me.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="2907f66c348ba0da34ad87ef57ce8447"; logging-data="1774356"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+JSCsEYwkunSL7VUudwteke9z6x5hBTzM=" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:Z9O6OKDB/Q36XZ1jjMnLQBm9uLQ= sha1:R1EZd86jFKU0QttvRBfeIpZ7upE= X-BSB-Auth: 1.c36d91fe77cef20b7a81.20230905013352BST.87o7ihsbkf.fsf@bsb.me.uk Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.c:173921 Bart writes: > On 04/09/2023 17:16, Ben Bacarisse wrote: > >> Do you know that gcc (with no other flags or options) will report no >> syntax errors for this source code: >> PROGRAM HELLO >> WRITE (*,*) 'Hello world' >> END >> ? Is it only in "my world" that the plain gcc command is not a C >> compiler? > > Your comments are misleading: But none the less accurate. Annoying, isn't it? Shall we make a pact and both agree to make only clear and not at all misleading comments? You first. -- Ben.