Path: csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Keith Thompson Newsgroups: comp.lang.c Subject: Re: Effect of CPP tags Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2024 13:42:36 -0800 Organization: None to speak of Lines: 25 Message-ID: <87o7dolxkj.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> References: <20240110133135.834@kylheku.com> <20240110182957.444@kylheku.com> <20240111081109.274@kylheku.com> <20240111133742.530@kylheku.com> <20240112134536.695@kylheku.com> <87zfxakqjd.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> <20240112200241.728@kylheku.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="033a6813111c3c17159ba08213684694"; logging-data="118848"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+b9g91urBm1LCw+UBEohh5" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:F9T4tWxAvsQO0ebY0f5B2j+1xRw= sha1:AtoAcziTn+fopldsaESNoHesHnA= Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.c:380130 bart writes: > On 13/01/2024 04:17, Kaz Kylheku wrote: >> On 2024-01-13, bart wrote: [...] >>> That's a reasonable thing to do. But how does make do it? Can't a >>> compiler apply the same approach if N files have been submitted? >> Yes. And in fact, languages with good module support like Modula-2 >> don't need external make utilities. > > Finally somebody admitting that some languages may not need make as much. Bart, seriously, what the hell are you talking about? It's true that some languages don't need "make" as much as C does. Nobody here has said otherwise, likely because other languages are largely off-topic here in comp.lang.c. By all means, don't use "make". Nobody wants you to use it. Nobody thinks you need to care how it works. -- Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com Working, but not speaking, for Medtronic void Void(void) { Void(); } /* The recursive call of the void */