Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Keith Thompson Newsgroups: comp.lang.c Subject: Re: "A diagram of C23 basic types" Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2025 23:12:13 -0700 Organization: None to speak of Lines: 25 Message-ID: <87mscprhhe.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> References: <87y0wjaysg.fsf@gmail.com> <87h62ys4w5.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> <86ecy2c5o4.fsf@linuxsc.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2025 08:12:16 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="da68f73767d3cb351ac0b16ea7c85d0b"; logging-data="32791"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/XOgpNYWRFb/XtYgnFGB2y" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cancel-Lock: sha1:Zhob9f8HbO5lI90qvWsGIUKLRlM= sha1:qBLhUKTb4MfeYlJ02ug+21yI6ns= Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.c:392237 Tim Rentsch writes: > James Kuyper writes: >> bart writes: >>> On 08/04/2025 22:46, Keith Thompson wrote: >>>> bart writes: >> ...>> Apparently the author of the chart chose to include types >> ...>> that are >> >>>> defined by the core language, not by the library. >>> >>> So here you're finally admitteding they are a different rank. >> >> The core language and the library are equal in rank, both being >> different parts of any implementation of C. > > This statement isn't exactly right. Some parts of the standard > library are available only in hosted implementations, and not in > freestanding implementations. True. Also, freestanding implementations must support and , among several other headers. -- Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com void Void(void) { Void(); } /* The recursive call of the void */