Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register
Groups > comp.lang.c > #396715
| Path | csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!nntp.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c |
| Subject | Re: type of decimal constants in msvc |
| Date | Sun, 01 Mar 2026 19:22:51 -0800 |
| Organization | None to speak of |
| Lines | 34 |
| Message-ID | <878qcaap9w.fsf@example.invalid> (permalink) |
| References | <1097ivh$ntii$1@dont-email.me> <10i3dpt$14ajr$1@dont-email.me> <875xa2u0p9.fsf@example.invalid> <10i3hkn$15jea$1@dont-email.me> <871pkqtdyy.fsf@example.invalid> <868qeusm4f.fsf@linuxsc.com> <87a4zawaj7.fsf@example.invalid> <86pl5nezbc.fsf@linuxsc.com> |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain |
| Injection-Date | Mon, 02 Mar 2026 03:22:52 +0000 (UTC) |
| Injection-Info | dont-email.me; posting-host="904fdc8ce99c4265d8d70c325ce3d825"; logging-data="847899"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/hY9+hoktR6R9muuBnsC78" |
| User-Agent | Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:1zwA/Ir0TuxyNIJTfFtR57Bx5zk= sha1:RlhAc/Usf7vgRS4C/fWmT8sH+x4= |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.c:396715 |
Show key headers only | View raw
Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> writes:
> Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> writes:
>> Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> writes:
>>> Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> writes:
>>>> Thiago Adams <thiago.adams@gmail.com> writes:
>>>>> Em 19/12/2025 09:15, Keith Thompson escreveu:
>>>> [...]
>>>>>> gcc's warning for 18408377700990114895 (which is slightly smaller
>>>>>> than 2**64) is "integer constant is so large that it is unsigned".
>>>>>> This is *incorrect* (and I think it's been reported as a bug), but
>>>>>> the incorrect wording of the warning is not a conformance issue.
>>>>>
>>>>> I am not understating why do you think this is a bug?
>>>>> Because it should not compile?
>>>>
>>>> No, because the message is factually incorrect.
>>>
>>> No, it isn't. The message might be misleading but it isn't wrong.
>>>
>>>> The integer constant 18408377700990114895 is not of any unsigned type.
>>>
>>> The message doesn't say the constant has an unsigned type. It says
>>> only that the constant is unsigned.
>>
>> What distinction are you making?
>
> The distinction I'm making is between what the statement actually
> says rather than how it might be interpreted.
That's extremely vague. I won't bother asking you for clarity.
--
Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com
void Void(void) { Void(); } /* The recursive call of the void */
Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar
Re: type of decimal constants in msvc Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2026-03-01 18:32 -0800 Re: type of decimal constants in msvc Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2026-03-01 19:22 -0800
csiph-web