Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: Top 10 most common hard skills listed on resumes...
Date: Sun, 01 Sep 2024 09:45:58 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 9
Message-ID: <86y14bs4op.fsf@linuxsc.com>
References: <vab101$3er$1@reader1.panix.com> <vai1ec$2fns2$1@dont-email.me> <874j75zftu.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <valrj7$367a8$2@dont-email.me> <87mskwy9t1.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <vanq4h$3iieb$1@dont-email.me> <875xrkxlgo.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <vapitn$3u1ub$1@dont-email.me> <87o75bwlp8.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <vaps06$3vg8l$1@dont-email.me> <871q27weeh.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <20240829083200.195@kylheku.com> <87v7zjuyd8.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <20240829084851.962@kylheku.com> <87mskvuxe9.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <vaq9tu$1te8$1@dont-email.me> <875xrivrg0.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <20240829191404.887@kylheku.com> <86cylqw2f8.fsf@linuxsc.com> <871q2568vl.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> <20240830232138.772@kylheku.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Injection-Date: Sun, 01 Sep 2024 18:45:58 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="1ccc4d5fef9c2c82c9c978d9286151e6"; logging-data="1643374"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19gy5s63RgApyhTeTNFcVk0DqKTuQdVbzY="
User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.4 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:ldc9Hazy+CUdRUv5fOLlPP3FVw4= sha1:7DKWFPzuuxPISDsE4AU2/KQBMgY=
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.c:388074

Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> writes:

> Any invalid syntax condition that can be removed using parentheses
> is not worth enforcing at the parse level.  If it's wrong to
> assign to x + 1, you also need to diagnose when it's (x + 1).
> It's better to have a single rule which catches both.

If you want to think that you are free to do so.  But the
statement is nothing more than one person's opinion.