Path: csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.quux.org!eternal-september.org!feeder2.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: else ladders practice
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2024 10:49:27 -0800
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 17
Message-ID: <86y117qhc8.fsf@linuxsc.com>
References: <3deb64c5b0ee344acd9fbaea1002baf7302c1e8f@i2pn2.org> <vg37nr$3bo0c$1@dont-email.me> <vg3b98$3cc8q$1@dont-email.me> <vg5351$3pada$1@dont-email.me> <vg62vg$3uv02$1@dont-email.me> <vgd3ro$2pvl4$1@paganini.bofh.team> <vgdc4q$1ikja$1@dont-email.me> <vgdt36$2r682$2@paganini.bofh.team> <vge8un$1o57r$3@dont-email.me> <vgpi5h$6s5t$1@paganini.bofh.team> <vgtsli$1690f$1@dont-email.me> <vhgr1v$2ovnd$1@paganini.bofh.team> <vhic66$1thk0$1@dont-email.me> <vhins8$1vuvp$1@dont-email.me> <vhj7nc$2svjh$1@paganini.bofh.team> <vhje8l$2412p$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Injection-Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2024 19:49:28 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="d0fcbf139f066190487faadf13f2576f"; logging-data="3084915"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/l/iR/zkN/1qD9NPc+mJF2IWur3fjl/p8="
User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.4 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:DLgZP6hisRjyDiWkC0V65gJX2qE= sha1:OXiQVU3M5Zt5heCg/MiTJUAFeaw=
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.c:389088

Bart <bc@freeuk.com> writes:

> It's funny how nobody seems to care about the speed of compilers
> (which can vary by 100:1), but for the generated programs, the 2:1
> speedup you might get by optimising it is vital!

I think most people would rather take this path (these times
are actual measured times of a recently written program):

    compile time:       1 second
    program run time:   ~7 hours

than this path (extrapolated using the ratios mentioned above):

    compile time:       0.01 second
    program run time:   ~14 hours