Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: typedef ... refactored
Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2020 23:10:04 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 8
Message-ID: <86wo1b75mr.fsf@linuxsc.com>
References: <7a5f16a3-d30d-46ec-9926-b0736428902do@googlegroups.com> <rgoo37$3ca$1@dont-email.me> <slrnrj3c08.u86.please@logancomp.rathbonelaw.com> <rgtcot$7i6$1@dont-email.me> <20200813005227.b02c40b51ddf5ad71c7ca82b@gmail.com> <rh5v58$349$1@dont-email.me> <SAvZG.2442895$fgO.1865466@fx12.am4> <rh61ij$h7d$1@dont-email.me> <rh683a$oi0$1@dont-email.me> <4yyZG.1646292$6_j.1423379@fx37.ams4> <rh6n9t$o62$1@dont-email.me> <87bljdx9i2.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> <86v9h39h3z.fsf@linuxsc.com> <20200828080553.439@kylheku.com> <87k0xiutv2.fsf@bsb.me.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="863d4a2dc2abe2253e6bb1e3e7980f5b"; logging-data="12156"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+WEacSCXLt0j3U3jIukGEAWKBP8kej/NE="
User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.4 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:FPOAwXsSdcNp+gHlVLe71WtskZI= sha1:UZxPE/lpAf/5RRUu3sjb8muE9l0=
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.c:154417

Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> writes:

> In the UK, stigmatising is unfair (or evidence-free) negative branding.

For what it's worth, in my own personal lexicon (decidedly US
English), neither stigma nor stigmatize carries an automatic
connotation of unfairness.  I think an element of unfairness
may be common but it is not a default assumption.