Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.c > #154417
| Path | csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c |
| Subject | Re: typedef ... refactored |
| Date | Wed, 02 Sep 2020 23:10:04 -0700 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Lines | 8 |
| Message-ID | <86wo1b75mr.fsf@linuxsc.com> (permalink) |
| References | <7a5f16a3-d30d-46ec-9926-b0736428902do@googlegroups.com> <rgoo37$3ca$1@dont-email.me> <slrnrj3c08.u86.please@logancomp.rathbonelaw.com> <rgtcot$7i6$1@dont-email.me> <20200813005227.b02c40b51ddf5ad71c7ca82b@gmail.com> <rh5v58$349$1@dont-email.me> <SAvZG.2442895$fgO.1865466@fx12.am4> <rh61ij$h7d$1@dont-email.me> <rh683a$oi0$1@dont-email.me> <4yyZG.1646292$6_j.1423379@fx37.ams4> <rh6n9t$o62$1@dont-email.me> <87bljdx9i2.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> <86v9h39h3z.fsf@linuxsc.com> <20200828080553.439@kylheku.com> <87k0xiutv2.fsf@bsb.me.uk> |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=us-ascii |
| Injection-Info | reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="863d4a2dc2abe2253e6bb1e3e7980f5b"; logging-data="12156"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+WEacSCXLt0j3U3jIukGEAWKBP8kej/NE=" |
| User-Agent | Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.4 (gnu/linux) |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:FPOAwXsSdcNp+gHlVLe71WtskZI= sha1:UZxPE/lpAf/5RRUu3sjb8muE9l0= |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.c:154417 |
Show key headers only | View raw
Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> writes: > In the UK, stigmatising is unfair (or evidence-free) negative branding. For what it's worth, in my own personal lexicon (decidedly US English), neither stigma nor stigmatize carries an automatic connotation of unfairness. I think an element of unfairness may be common but it is not a default assumption.
Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Re: typedef ... refactored Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2020-08-28 03:53 -0700
Re: typedef ... refactored Kaz Kylheku <793-849-0957@kylheku.com> - 2020-08-28 15:30 +0000
Re: typedef ... refactored Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-29 02:24 +0100
Re: typedef ... refactored Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2020-09-02 23:10 -0700
Re: typedef ... refactored Malcolm McLean <malcolm.arthur.mclean@gmail.com> - 2020-09-02 04:11 -0700
csiph-web