Re: typedef ... refactored

From	Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.c
Subject	Re: typedef ... refactored
Date	2020-09-02 23:10 -0700
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID	<86wo1b75mr.fsf@linuxsc.com> (permalink)
References	(10 earlier) <rh6n9t$o62$1@dont-email.me> <87bljdx9i2.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> <86v9h39h3z.fsf@linuxsc.com> <20200828080553.439@kylheku.com> <87k0xiutv2.fsf@bsb.me.uk>

Show all headers | View raw

Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> writes:

> In the UK, stigmatising is unfair (or evidence-free) negative branding.

For what it's worth, in my own personal lexicon (decidedly US
English), neither stigma nor stigmatize carries an automatic
connotation of unfairness.  I think an element of unfairness
may be common but it is not a default assumption.

Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Re: typedef ... refactored Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2020-08-28 03:53 -0700
  Re: typedef ... refactored Kaz Kylheku <793-849-0957@kylheku.com> - 2020-08-28 15:30 +0000
    Re: typedef ... refactored Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-29 02:24 +0100
      Re: typedef ... refactored Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2020-09-02 23:10 -0700
    Re: typedef ... refactored Malcolm McLean <malcolm.arthur.mclean@gmail.com> - 2020-09-02 04:11 -0700

csiph-web