Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Tim Rentsch Newsgroups: comp.lang.c Subject: Re: Which code style do you prefer the most? Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2025 10:34:45 -0800 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 20 Message-ID: <86wmd6ufne.fsf@linuxsc.com> References: <87frk10w51.fsf@onesoftnet.eu.org> <20250228144442.00002037@yahoo.com> <868qpnw2sn.fsf@linuxsc.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Injection-Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2025 19:34:46 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="6e9dfb039af0c0bf4d4ce41d1363f2d2"; logging-data="1514301"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/f4A8HgWmYLak6QoGA2chDpiVEDSC9ih4=" User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.4 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:LwzaQKrtYIKR1bXr09YQ1d1j+Xg= sha1:k7Ggzh/0gwpnsA00BvKQnLfv43I= Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.c:390715 scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) writes: > Tim Rentsch writes: > >> My sense is that an aspect ratio of 7:5 or 3:2 (in both cases >> height:width) is about right for one page. We might want a small >> strip of screen real estate for a header, so going from 1.5 to >> 1.6 seems workable (note incidentally that 1920:1200 is a ratio >> of 1.6). But HD is 1.78 to 1; that shape is just awkward for >> the display of text. > > Personally, I generally use vim with both horizontal and > vertical splits to edit multiple source files and headers > in a single window (using tabs as well, since the project > has several hundred source files). Each split is usually > about 30x90. Nothing wrong with using HD aspect ratio for display of multiple pages. My comment above is about an HD aspect ratio for display of a single page.