Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Tim Rentsch
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: Which code style do you prefer the most?
Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2025 10:34:45 -0800
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 20
Message-ID: <86wmd6ufne.fsf@linuxsc.com>
References: <87frk10w51.fsf@onesoftnet.eu.org> <20250228144442.00002037@yahoo.com> <868qpnw2sn.fsf@linuxsc.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Injection-Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2025 19:34:46 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="6e9dfb039af0c0bf4d4ce41d1363f2d2"; logging-data="1514301"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/f4A8HgWmYLak6QoGA2chDpiVEDSC9ih4="
User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.4 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:LwzaQKrtYIKR1bXr09YQ1d1j+Xg= sha1:k7Ggzh/0gwpnsA00BvKQnLfv43I=
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.c:390715
scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) writes:
> Tim Rentsch writes:
>
>> My sense is that an aspect ratio of 7:5 or 3:2 (in both cases
>> height:width) is about right for one page. We might want a small
>> strip of screen real estate for a header, so going from 1.5 to
>> 1.6 seems workable (note incidentally that 1920:1200 is a ratio
>> of 1.6). But HD is 1.78 to 1; that shape is just awkward for
>> the display of text.
>
> Personally, I generally use vim with both horizontal and
> vertical splits to edit multiple source files and headers
> in a single window (using tabs as well, since the project
> has several hundred source files). Each split is usually
> about 30x90.
Nothing wrong with using HD aspect ratio for display of
multiple pages. My comment above is about an HD aspect
ratio for display of a single page.