Path: csiph.com!news.swapon.de!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: Good hash for pointers
Date: Thu, 23 May 2024 15:49:42 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 7
Message-ID: <86v834i1o9.fsf@linuxsc.com>
References: <v2n88p$1nlcc$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Injection-Date: Fri, 24 May 2024 00:49:45 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="4e2ccf3374e48a9f13e87ba250cb95a8"; logging-data="2074852"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19DK4KpuHe4ugfwJwDONN8R9SV6YXGdBDQ="
User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.4 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:2EO8iO88ofAGZtFttgPhFbzFi/M= sha1:LzxxnvVMlSVrud6Z61ulvFImEoE=
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.c:384928

Malcolm McLean <malcolm.arthur.mclean@gmail.com> writes:

> What is a good hash function for pointers to use in portable
> ANSI C?

I have a preliminary question.  Do you really mean ANSI C, or
is C99 acceptable?