Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register
Groups > comp.lang.c > #387530
| From | Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c |
| Subject | Re: is it possible to have functions with 0, 1, or 2 args? |
| Date | 2024-08-12 15:39 -0700 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <86v8051i41.fsf@linuxsc.com> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <20240805151946.00000bce@yahoo.com> <86wmkmfhaz.fsf@linuxsc.com> <v9chcl$37e8f$1@dont-email.me> <8634naccp3.fsf@linuxsc.com> <v9colj$38jkq$1@dont-email.me> |
Richard Harnden <richard.nospam@gmail.invalid> writes: > On 12/08/2024 10:28, Tim Rentsch wrote: > >> Richard Harnden <richard.nospam@gmail.invalid> writes: >> >>> On 12/08/2024 06:20, Tim Rentsch wrote: >>> >>>> Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> writes: >>>> >>>>> On Mon, 05 Aug 2024 08:26:04 +0000 >>>>> Mark Summerfield <mark@qtrac.eu> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> According to my understanding, vararg functions without arguments will >>>>> become possible in C23. But since fully functional C23 compilers do not >>>>> exist yet, right now the answer to your question is "No". >>>> >>>> Even in C99 varargs functions can be called without arguments. >>>> The question here is more subtle. In fact it is possible even >>>> in C99 and C11 to do what he wants, but it isn't easy, and it >>>> is far from obvious how to go about it. Still, if the question >>>> is "can this be done?", the answer is Yes even now. >>> >>> How does va_start know where to, um, start from if there's no last >>> named argument? >> >> Sorry, I meant to say macros, not functions (using ... and __VA_ARGS__). >> The original question is about macro definitions, not function >> definitions, and I didn't read carefully enough. > > No worries. > > So ... how can you do it with macros? I'm still working on preparing an answer to that question. > And, even if it's possible, is it a good idea? An excellent question. I expect there are two schools of thought. :)
Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
is it possible to have functions with 0, 1, or 2 args? Mark Summerfield <mark@qtrac.eu> - 2024-08-05 08:26 +0000
Re: is it possible to have functions with 0, 1, or 2 args? Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2024-08-05 15:19 +0300
Re: is it possible to have functions with 0, 1, or 2 args? Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2024-08-11 22:20 -0700
Re: is it possible to have functions with 0, 1, or 2 args? Richard Harnden <richard.nospam@gmail.invalid> - 2024-08-12 09:33 +0100
Re: is it possible to have functions with 0, 1, or 2 args? Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2024-08-12 02:28 -0700
Re: is it possible to have functions with 0, 1, or 2 args? Richard Harnden <richard.nospam@gmail.invalid> - 2024-08-12 11:37 +0100
Re: is it possible to have functions with 0, 1, or 2 args? Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2024-08-12 15:39 -0700
Re: is it possible to have functions with 0, 1, or 2 args? Blue-Maned_Hawk <bluemanedhawk@invalid.invalid> - 2024-08-05 18:46 +0000
Re: is it possible to have functions with 0, 1, or 2 args? Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-08-07 23:04 +0000
Re: is it possible to have functions with 0, 1, or 2 args? Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2024-08-11 10:43 -0700
Re: is it possible to have functions with 0, 1, or 2 args? Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2024-08-11 22:15 -0700
csiph-web