Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Tim Rentsch Newsgroups: comp.lang.c Subject: Re: Which code style do you prefer the most? Date: Sun, 02 Mar 2025 00:49:39 -0800 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 16 Message-ID: <86tt8bx1ek.fsf@linuxsc.com> References: <20250225104754.267@kylheku.com> <874j0g2a8u.fsf@onesoftnet.eu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Injection-Date: Sun, 02 Mar 2025 09:49:45 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="3262fa73ab11de5fd8cc37f0606a7eed"; logging-data="746144"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/12/pgizqpz7Np9XsizRnqynJEfDnVaK4=" User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.4 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:t7wQfpCO3Z1zlHL4J8d/Q7N0JFc= sha1:MmsQF7eIscCmRd+92t1CRKtjkiM= Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.c:390631 scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) writes: > [using // instead of /* ... */ to comment out lines of code] > > I disagree with this. A line of code should never be commented > out; simply removed if not necessary. During development it can be useful to comment out one or more lines of code, but leave the commented lines in the source file. The point is we don't always know what is necessary and what isn't. What matters when code is finished and ready to be shipped is not the same as what matters when code is in the process of being developed. That distinction also applies to other things besides whether to remove certain lines of code or just comment them out.