Path: csiph.com!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Tim Rentsch
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: Good hash for pointers
Date: Thu, 30 May 2024 19:27:48 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 17
Message-ID: <86sexypvff.fsf@linuxsc.com>
References: <86fru6gsqr.fsf@linuxsc.com> <8634q5hjsp.fsf@linuxsc.com> <86le3wfsmd.fsf@linuxsc.com> <86ed9ofq14.fsf@linuxsc.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Injection-Date: Fri, 31 May 2024 04:27:48 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="75c895ee66ef08392f27be5b3e8de353"; logging-data="2173897"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18HY83pSr3qC2K73fY3kZsaRQVSAvyGJyE="
User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.4 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:t3bx13g9rxJlztPBrP08F/Y63AI= sha1:rYiGHFEJOlvVaI7P3n7Fi4ODt3E=
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.c:385339
Bonita Montero writes:
> Am 26.05.2024 um 19:20 schrieb Tim Rentsch:
>
>> I say the output quality is poor because I have run tests that
>> show the poor output quality.
>
> If you chose a prime whose double is beyond 64 bit there's an
> equal distribution among the 64 bit modulos.
>
>> I've done that with a prime of my own choosing and also with
>> 18446744073709551557, the value you suggested.
>
> Show me your code.
Oh get real. It's not my job to make up for your
laziness.