Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: Results of survey re. a new array size operator
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2025 02:19:59 -0800
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 13
Message-ID: <86sep12a7k.fsf@linuxsc.com>
References: <87a5bgsnql.fsf@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Injection-Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2025 11:20:00 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="ba8d9ca2da4b9314498ee7469992f70e"; logging-data="2450859"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18avar78i/EgJpyzTAn4zzxxGKV4cVyuE8="
User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.4 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:gYGePR1cpxby6n9M0fKJk+F+NgA= sha1:U7MYsWzA5olvsjV0e5YdGp4Q04U=
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.c:390183

Alexis <flexibeast@gmail.com> writes:

> Hi all,
>
> JeanHeyd Meneide, a Project Editor for WG14, has just posted the
> results of a survey re. the preferred form of a new array size
> operator:  [...]

Sadly it is becoming more and more apparent that the C standard
committee has been infected by the C++ disease.

(My thanks to Alexis for keeping the group informed on this
matter.)