Path: csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.quux.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Tim Rentsch Newsgroups: comp.lang.c Subject: Re: question about linker Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2024 21:06:50 -0800 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 26 Message-ID: <86r06wosk5.fsf@linuxsc.com> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Injection-Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2024 06:06:50 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="8f1c290f3ddf609884269e518a4a547d"; logging-data="448952"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18VId6cA7FuXaCpCU4Lvwf9UYoVdOMZI7A=" User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.4 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:X1PZlAQiywD26RZxoWRxK2aYLp4= sha1:Ljf3V609j6rjUMNuq8MxlBnkLdE= Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.c:389161 Bart writes: > On 26/11/2024 20:00, Bart wrote: > >> On 26/11/2024 19:38, Thiago Adams wrote: >> >>> Do you have any idea what else can be simplified when creating a C >>> compiler? >> >> What are you asking; are you thinking of writing one? Because C >> compilers already exist! >> >> If so, think of what you would find troublesome. I could create a >> long list of things that makes C harder to compile than my own >> language. > > Since BGB posted a list, here's mine; it is not exhaustive: > > > Hard C Features > > [...] Most of the items on your list are not really very hard. Some are rather tedious, and some are something of a pain in the ass, but that doesn't make implementing them hard; just tedious.