Path: csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.quux.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Tim Rentsch
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: question about linker
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2024 21:06:50 -0800
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 26
Message-ID: <86r06wosk5.fsf@linuxsc.com>
References:
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Injection-Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2024 06:06:50 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="8f1c290f3ddf609884269e518a4a547d"; logging-data="448952"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18VId6cA7FuXaCpCU4Lvwf9UYoVdOMZI7A="
User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.4 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:X1PZlAQiywD26RZxoWRxK2aYLp4= sha1:Ljf3V609j6rjUMNuq8MxlBnkLdE=
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.c:389161
Bart writes:
> On 26/11/2024 20:00, Bart wrote:
>
>> On 26/11/2024 19:38, Thiago Adams wrote:
>>
>>> Do you have any idea what else can be simplified when creating a C
>>> compiler?
>>
>> What are you asking; are you thinking of writing one? Because C
>> compilers already exist!
>>
>> If so, think of what you would find troublesome. I could create a
>> long list of things that makes C harder to compile than my own
>> language.
>
> Since BGB posted a list, here's mine; it is not exhaustive:
>
>
> Hard C Features
>
> [...]
Most of the items on your list are not really very hard. Some
are rather tedious, and some are something of a pain in the ass,
but that doesn't make implementing them hard; just tedious.