Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Tim Rentsch Newsgroups: comp.lang.c Subject: Re: Loops (was Re: do { quit; } else { }) Date: Wed, 14 May 2025 20:44:54 -0700 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 30 Message-ID: <86o6vuv8p5.fsf@linuxsc.com> References: <20250415153419.00004cf7@yahoo.com> <86h62078i8.fsf@linuxsc.com> <20250504180833.00000906@yahoo.com> <86plggzilx.fsf@linuxsc.com> <86ldr4yx0x.fsf@linuxsc.com> <87wmam4xa5.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> <868qn2zl1m.fsf@linuxsc.com> <87jz6m4m2o.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> <86selaxprh.fsf@linuxsc.com> <874ixq41xs.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> <86frh9ykrv.fsf@linuxsc.com> <877c2l370s.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Injection-Date: Thu, 15 May 2025 05:44:59 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="2c1451103104245a7b7395a980375437"; logging-data="3106249"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/qXJuiVyvQu31IYzSsmRcxPQzZapcTUZg=" User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.4 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:eb7kHo4+LhBmR8FBsL2C42h1yyM= sha1:QqLXAfEEUncfbI7uZKUdVr+68bs= Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.c:393417 Keith Thompson writes: > Tim Rentsch writes: > >> Keith Thompson writes: > > [...] > >>> If you mean that someone might use `[static N]` in a function's >>> definition but not in a declaration, sure, but I would always >>> make sure they match as closely as possible. [...] >> >> It strikes me that you have a rather self-centered view of the >> world. The vast majority of all C code is written by people other >> than yourself. > > [...] > > Tim, I am not interested in exchanging personal insults with you. > (Yes, the quoted text above comes across as in insult, however you > intended it.) > > If the only way to avoid that is to filter out your posts, I will, > with some regret, do that. I would miss out on your technical > contributions, but I'm willing to pay that price to avoid your > hostility. There was no animosity meant in my comments. I am very sorry if it came across otherwise. I am making an effort to frame my future statements to help with this.