Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Tim Rentsch
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: Loops (was Re: do { quit; } else { })
Date: Wed, 14 May 2025 20:44:54 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 30
Message-ID: <86o6vuv8p5.fsf@linuxsc.com>
References: <20250415153419.00004cf7@yahoo.com> <86h62078i8.fsf@linuxsc.com> <20250504180833.00000906@yahoo.com> <86plggzilx.fsf@linuxsc.com> <86ldr4yx0x.fsf@linuxsc.com> <87wmam4xa5.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> <868qn2zl1m.fsf@linuxsc.com> <87jz6m4m2o.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> <86selaxprh.fsf@linuxsc.com> <874ixq41xs.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> <86frh9ykrv.fsf@linuxsc.com> <877c2l370s.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Injection-Date: Thu, 15 May 2025 05:44:59 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="2c1451103104245a7b7395a980375437"; logging-data="3106249"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/qXJuiVyvQu31IYzSsmRcxPQzZapcTUZg="
User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.4 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:eb7kHo4+LhBmR8FBsL2C42h1yyM= sha1:QqLXAfEEUncfbI7uZKUdVr+68bs=
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.c:393417
Keith Thompson writes:
> Tim Rentsch writes:
>
>> Keith Thompson writes:
>
> [...]
>
>>> If you mean that someone might use `[static N]` in a function's
>>> definition but not in a declaration, sure, but I would always
>>> make sure they match as closely as possible. [...]
>>
>> It strikes me that you have a rather self-centered view of the
>> world. The vast majority of all C code is written by people other
>> than yourself.
>
> [...]
>
> Tim, I am not interested in exchanging personal insults with you.
> (Yes, the quoted text above comes across as in insult, however you
> intended it.)
>
> If the only way to avoid that is to filter out your posts, I will,
> with some regret, do that. I would miss out on your technical
> contributions, but I'm willing to pay that price to avoid your
> hostility.
There was no animosity meant in my comments. I am very sorry
if it came across otherwise. I am making an effort to frame
my future statements to help with this.