Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: technology discussion =?utf-8?Q?=E2=86=92?= does the world need a "new" C ?
Date: Sat, 06 Jul 2024 20:04:17 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 37
Message-ID: <86msmtc37y.fsf@linuxsc.com>
References: <v66eci$2qeee$1@dont-email.me> <v67gt1$2vq6a$2@dont-email.me> <v687h2$36i6p$1@dont-email.me> <871q48w98e.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> <v68dsm$37sg2$1@dont-email.me> <87plrsultu.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <v68sft$3a6lh$1@dont-email.me> <87ed87v4wi.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <v6adrm$3ljg6$1@dont-email.me> <87v81ita77.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <87sewmt7da.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Injection-Date: Sun, 07 Jul 2024 05:04:18 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="940a3321ebe7e91666808b6f59645346"; logging-data="199703"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+FARNEQD4sqnhCP6tQmvsjR4cyWV+vKQY="
User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.4 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:wV4Lr4Dl/FcASTout6J2g6xAAyg= sha1:4uRkAG+pF728X3mwpGJOCOnJD4w=
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.c:386845

Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> writes:

> Ben Bacarisse <ben@bsb.me.uk> writes:
>
>> BGB <cr88192@gmail.com> writes:
>>
>>> On 7/5/2024 5:40 PM, Ben Bacarisse wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>>> Whole language design is still a hypothetical at this point anyways (and my
>>> actual compiler does support multidimensional arrays).
>>
>> Ah.  I think that when you've written most of it, you will see that
>> ruling out arrays of arrays will have not simplifying effect.
>
> Indeed.  I believe (based on no direct experience) that you could write
> a fully conforming C compiler without even thinking about
> multidimensional arrays, and if you get the array code right,
> multidimensional arrays will just work.

There are some corner cases that seem to require some thinking.
For example,

    extern int x[];
    extern int y[][10];

are both alright, but

    extern int z[10][];

is not.  There are similar cases with function parameters, and
maybe with VLAs.  Also, possibly, flexible array members (do I
have that name right?).

Not saying the amount of thinking needed is overpowering, but
it does seem to be greater than zero.