Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Tim Rentsch Newsgroups: comp.lang.c Subject: Re: Programming exercise/challenge Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2021 00:11:50 -0800 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 23 Message-ID: <86lfcdjxa1.fsf@linuxsc.com> References: <86wnxwkyol.fsf@linuxsc.com> <86czybpljj.fsf@linuxsc.com> <1ebc19c3-093d-4bc0-b680-aedbb9576eb5n@googlegroups.com> <868s8uozxo.fsf@linuxsc.com> <6a2e3784-1cb3-4d6a-99c2-6ac650dd6fben@googlegroups.com> <864kjbo2ql.fsf@linuxsc.com> <44c73f50-33af-43bb-afa2-a3b0244c7160n@googlegroups.com> <865z3nm8f9.fsf@linuxsc.com> <5049cc01-a549-4022-8f4c-deda87ab20c9n@googlegroups.com> <87tur639y3.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> <5c948a85-873e-49af-9df8-34a0a971c692n@googlegroups.com> <87pn1u2dqi.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> <9859d1d8-7bce-4c91-91b5-cfa6e7c0e732n@googlegroups.com> <017d1f71-6869-47d1-81c0-a432bced659cn@googlegroups.com> <86k0ryl7jq.fsf@linuxsc.com> <874kj2tkj5.fsf@bsb.me.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="fd8ef1eef24682511c6bbfeeeac524cb"; logging-data="25665"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18QiiporJhpoWc918HOG7we8IZSDfwcZvw=" User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.4 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:52OOIjfN24/7+kPW45Xg/QnIL5s= sha1:Wiq4bU6LnC5Fu0EBVre0Qp9J318= Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.c:158675 Ben Bacarisse writes: > Tim Rentsch writes: > >> luser droog writes: >> >>> I'm still using google groups. >> >> For goodness sakes, WHY? > > Access on the move from a phone or tablet? A work-supplied laptop with > software installation restrictions? Even if these are not the primary > method, GG won't synchronise with proper newsreaders, so its GG > everywhere, or you pick your way through already seen posts. > > It may be none of these, and given this: > >> Friends don't let friends use google groups. > > ... you were probably being rhetorical, in which case, ignore. My last statement was partly tongue-in-cheek. My question however was not rhetorical, and I appreciate your answer.