Path: csiph.com!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Tim Rentsch Newsgroups: comp.lang.c Subject: Re: strings or enums? Date: Sat, 05 Aug 2023 09:45:34 -0700 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 39 Message-ID: <86jzu9fnf5.fsf@linuxsc.com> References: <30ab3a27-dbe4-40ad-ad18-23f4123a56c9n@googlegroups.com> <762748f4-bfc8-4927-845d-940ee59ed838n@googlegroups.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="943f511331d2b471aa1b6ebff38979e9"; logging-data="1910536"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18ZxgPvYpQaoazAKFGLAhmU2++SPt8+A1E=" User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.4 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:6+sI90THiH6hedRF9I7LpNbe8K4= sha1:fxV2kEWVF+srnUtpnxZ5rJAmLQ0= Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.c:171687 Vir Campestris writes: > On 02/08/2023 22:54, David Brown wrote: > >> On 02/08/2023 18:30, Malcolm McLean wrote: >> >>> On Wednesday, 2 August 2023 at 17:28:39 UTC+1, David Brown wrote: >>> >>>> On 02/08/2023 18:00, Malcolm McLean wrote: >>>> >>>>> If whitespace is disallowed, humans prefer names which are >>>>> simply concatenated. >>>> >>>> You do not speak for humanity. >>> >>> Experiments have been done. I can't remember the references off >>> the top of my head. >> >> I don't believe you. (I'm not saying you are lying, merely >> mistaken or misremembering.) [...] > > It's certainly not my experience, and I've never seen a coding > standard that suggests it. > > Compare > > loadasutf8wthknownformat > > with > LoadAsUtf8WithKnownFormat (or loadAsUtf8WithKnownFormat) > > or > load_as_utf8_with_known_format > > And also think would you spot loadasutf8wthunknownformat? The idea that the just-concatenate style is widely preferred or easier to read is completely deranged. And, I am confident, easy to debunk through objective experimentation.