Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.c > #388432
| From | Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c |
| Subject | Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ? |
| Date | 2024-09-17 12:52 -0700 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <86jzfa9hxn.fsf@linuxsc.com> (permalink) |
| References | (16 earlier) <8634m0ccjc.fsf@linuxsc.com> <87zfo7rija.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> <vc9lia$2uha1$1@dont-email.me> <86wmjaa0al.fsf@linuxsc.com> <vccd1a$3k74f$1@dont-email.me> |
Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> writes: > On 17.09.2024 15:15, Tim Rentsch wrote: > >> Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> writes: >> >> [excerpted for brevity] >> >>> In the domain of German speaking countries - isn't Tim located there? >>> (I somehow got the impression) - we've heard about "Parameterubergabe"; >>> [..] means passing, transferring, handing over, transmitting, etc. >>> >>> Because of that - and because I could not follow the thoughts of Tim's >>> last paragraph with his conclusion; I didn't find it convincing - I'd >>> think that "passing" would fit better, also in the light of historic >>> usage [hereabouts], even though I've often heared (and also used) the >>> phrase "call by" in the English CS domain in the past (and probably >>> still used to it). >> >> If you have something to say to me please respond to my posting >> directly. > > I respond at the place that appears most appropriate for what > I want to say in the context I want to reply to. I'm not here > to serve your, umm, "standards" (to avoid the word "idee fixe"); > and you just have to accept that[*], I fear. > > I'm sure others here have no problem to go upward the thread > hierarchy one more level to find your text that I deliberately > didn't quote for the reason (still quoted above) I mentioned; > I don't think they're worth quoting, they provide no argument, > they were fuzzy. (Of course all only IMO.) My statement was meant as a request, not a demand. I asked because I wasn't sure if you had something in particular to say to me or if you were just talking more or less aimlessly.
Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ? Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2024-09-01 18:09 -0700
Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ? Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2024-09-01 19:01 -0700
Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ? Ben Bacarisse <ben@bsb.me.uk> - 2024-09-02 12:10 +0100
Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ? Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2024-09-02 15:18 -0700
Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ? Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2024-09-08 06:04 +0200
Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ? Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2024-09-15 23:56 -0700
Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ? Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2024-09-16 03:37 -0700
Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ? Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2024-09-16 18:15 +0200
Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ? Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2024-09-17 06:15 -0700
Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ? Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2024-09-17 19:07 +0200
Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ? Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2024-09-17 12:52 -0700
Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ? Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2024-09-26 09:37 -0700
Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ? Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2024-09-26 21:28 -0700
Wording discussion (was Re: technology discussion) Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2024-09-27 14:21 +0200
Re: Wording discussion (was Re: technology discussion) Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2024-09-27 14:09 -0700
Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ? Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2024-09-27 14:03 -0700
Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ? Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2024-09-28 00:26 +0200
Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ? Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2024-09-28 06:43 +0200
Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ? Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2024-10-29 08:07 -0700
Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ? Ben Bacarisse <ben@bsb.me.uk> - 2024-09-16 22:41 +0100
csiph-web