Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: OT: CSES Number Spiral algorithm
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2025 23:52:16 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 30
Message-ID: <86frj6nae7.fsf@linuxsc.com>
References: <vrhgqd$3ku1m$2@dont-email.me> <861puro8dh.fsf@linuxsc.com> <vrhsi4$3t4cg$1@dont-email.me> <86sen7mpjz.fsf@linuxsc.com> <vrin36$jef2$3@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Injection-Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2025 07:52:18 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="9bc70e960ad448c1d41587328c2ae099"; logging-data="1068691"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/i26UXMQ4lc70Z1UFoMd4qlITN/gYIdD4="
User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.4 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:Y2gXA8h1L+BTH+hvaEYBZsZzqik= sha1:7DjRtn+O1xtj6+SkB+5d1bHYMKg=
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.c:391465

Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> writes:

> On 20/03/2025 20:10, Tim Rentsch wrote:
>
>> Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> writes:
>>
>>> On 20/03/2025 18:38, Tim Rentsch wrote:
>>>
>>>> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> writes:
>>>
>>> <snip>
>>>
>>>>> My full C code submission was accepted the first time.
>>>>>
>>>>> How would you have done it?
>>>>
>>>> This posting is not appropriate for comp.lang.c.  Putting "OT" in
>>>> the subject line doesn't excuse its lack of suitability.
>>>
>>> You're right, of course, but would it have hurt so very much to point
>>> the OP towards comp.programming?
>>
>> An oversight on my part.  Thank you for chiming in.
>
> His questions were tailor-made for comp.programming, but it turns out
> he's just another toy-thrower, so it matters not.

Perhaps not, but even so it was an oversight on my part not
to suggest comp.programming, and I thank you for reminding
me of that.