Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: "A diagram of C23 basic types"
Date: Thu, 08 May 2025 06:08:03 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 20
Message-ID: <86frhf1c98.fsf@linuxsc.com>
References: <87y0wjaysg.fsf@gmail.com> <vsjg6t$20pdb$1@dont-email.me> <vsjgjn$1v1n4$1@dont-email.me> <vsjk4k$24q5m$1@dont-email.me> <vsjlcp$230a5$1@dont-email.me> <vsjmdl$277bk$1@dont-email.me> <VsdHP.1828827$TBhc.1078002@fx16.iad> <vskjlo$34st8$1@dont-email.me> <20250402220614.431@kylheku.com> <85mscxlqnb.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> <vsl9sn$3vdjj$2@dont-email.me> <20250403121946.134@kylheku.com> <vsms75$1i8ud$1@dont-email.me> <vsnhq6$291i3$4@dont-email.me> <20250409124900.00000fa1@yahoo.com> <861pu1ccsg.fsf@linuxsc.com> <20250410114252.0000218a@yahoo.com> <86a58j9l03.fsf@linuxsc.com> <20250414124426.000020fc@yahoo.com> <86jz6u4p2y.fsf@linuxsc.com> <20250506112639.00006264@yahoo.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Injection-Date: Thu, 08 May 2025 15:08:04 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="8ae053696287f1619c3fbdcfaf84f4fc"; logging-data="1861917"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19qvJiSmwFyjoYCoAkGZCfeSW8I6vzjnH0="
User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.4 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:xr6+JMTpvYnlsAD/CczU1EBiSCE= sha1:vvC7WhdxEGFsnIphGw5D1DhzUXk=
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.c:393250

Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> writes:

> On Mon, 05 May 2025 16:25:57 -0700
> Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> wrote:
>
>> Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> writes:
>>
>>> My impression was that Philipp Klaus Krause that posts here, if
>>> infrequently, is a member of WG14.
>>
>> Do you know if he is a member, or is he just an interested
>> participant?
>
> He appears in the picture named "WG14 members attending the Strasbourg
> meeting in-person for the finalization of C23".  To me that sounds as
> sufficient proof.

Thank you for the additional information.  I want to be clear
that it was not my intention to express doubt;  I was just
looking for clarification.