Path: csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Tim Rentsch
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: structs passed by copy
Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2023 11:30:55 -0800
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 32
Message-ID: <86edq18yog.fsf@linuxsc.com>
References: <76ec6d87-0f5d-4671-b4c8-7023e3da787an@googlegroups.com> <87o7pzdcmj.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> <86mt4p9457.fsf@linuxsc.com> <87y1o9lq2w.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Injection-Info: reader01.eternal-september.org; posting-host="08553e16564f4582e6ecc9eb792331ba"; logging-data="49796"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18JDXxM2RD4HcwRD93eo2lPyMAZUzGkzc0="
User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.4 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:OpF7AWjDUbmKiy70Hkv9DJESDDw= sha1:QWZdK54JbllgGNlYV8tByvz2Dys=
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.c:169544
Keith Thompson writes:
> Tim Rentsch writes:
>
>> Keith Thompson writes:
>>
>>> Jorgen Grahn writes:
>>>
>>>> On Fri, 2023-01-20, Thiago Adams wrote:
>>>
>>> [...]
>>>
>>>>> Could it be replaced by const * ?
>>>>
>>>> No.
>>>
>>> Could you expand on that?
>
> [...]
>
>> It *could* be done,
>
> [...]
>
> I see.
>
> Perhaps next time you could expand on the nuances in your initial reply
> rather than waiting a few weeks to explain what you mean.
I don't know what you mean. That was my initial and only
reply to this question. Might you be confusing me with
another poster?