Path: csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Tim Rentsch Newsgroups: comp.lang.c Subject: Re: structs passed by copy Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2023 11:30:55 -0800 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 32 Message-ID: <86edq18yog.fsf@linuxsc.com> References: <76ec6d87-0f5d-4671-b4c8-7023e3da787an@googlegroups.com> <87o7pzdcmj.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> <86mt4p9457.fsf@linuxsc.com> <87y1o9lq2w.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Injection-Info: reader01.eternal-september.org; posting-host="08553e16564f4582e6ecc9eb792331ba"; logging-data="49796"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18JDXxM2RD4HcwRD93eo2lPyMAZUzGkzc0=" User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.4 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:OpF7AWjDUbmKiy70Hkv9DJESDDw= sha1:QWZdK54JbllgGNlYV8tByvz2Dys= Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.c:169544 Keith Thompson writes: > Tim Rentsch writes: > >> Keith Thompson writes: >> >>> Jorgen Grahn writes: >>> >>>> On Fri, 2023-01-20, Thiago Adams wrote: >>> >>> [...] >>> >>>>> Could it be replaced by const * ? >>>> >>>> No. >>> >>> Could you expand on that? > > [...] > >> It *could* be done, > > [...] > > I see. > > Perhaps next time you could expand on the nuances in your initial reply > rather than waiting a few weeks to explain what you mean. I don't know what you mean. That was my initial and only reply to this question. Might you be confusing me with another poster?