Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: Top 10 most common hard skills listed on resumes...
Date: Sun, 01 Sep 2024 13:14:34 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 24
Message-ID: <86ed63rv11.fsf@linuxsc.com>
References: <vab101$3er$1@reader1.panix.com> <87mskwy9t1.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <vanq4h$3iieb$1@dont-email.me> <875xrkxlgo.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <vapitn$3u1ub$1@dont-email.me> <87o75bwlp8.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <vaps06$3vg8l$1@dont-email.me> <871q27weeh.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <20240829083200.195@kylheku.com> <87v7zjuyd8.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <20240829084851.962@kylheku.com> <87mskvuxe9.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <vaq9tu$1te8$1@dont-email.me> <875xrivrg0.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <20240829191404.887@kylheku.com> <86cylqw2f8.fsf@linuxsc.com> <871q2568vl.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> <20240830232138.772@kylheku.com> <86y14bs4op.fsf@linuxsc.com> <87ttez2rry.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> <20240901105350.914@kylheku.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Injection-Date: Sun, 01 Sep 2024 22:14:34 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="1ccc4d5fef9c2c82c9c978d9286151e6"; logging-data="1702070"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+UdNM6TgwOJVjM03JX7aQ5OBSsqjuNqdQ="
User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.4 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:hbIJcI/IU4EvHvOCoBVACZgHFcs= sha1:jpMzc3HmLSqn1/RC7ZOwgQJgJ1Y=
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.c:388081

Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> writes:

> On 2024-09-01, Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> writes:
>>
>>> Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> writes:
>>>
>>>> Any invalid syntax condition that can be removed using parentheses
>>>> is not worth enforcing at the parse level.  If it's wrong to
>>>> assign to x + 1, you also need to diagnose when it's (x + 1).
>>>> It's better to have a single rule which catches both.
>>>
>>> If you want to think that you are free to do so.  But the
>>> statement is nothing more than one person's opinion.
>>
>> Tim, are you under the impression that we need help figuring out
>> whether something is an opinion or not?  I don't believe we do.
>
> The point obviously not that it's an opinion, but that it's only one
> person's opinion;  i.e. that I have an opinion not shared by anyone,
> insinuating that it's extremely weird or poorly considered [...]

I wasn't insinuating any such thing.