Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Tim Rentsch
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: "A diagram of C23 basic types"
Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2025 21:36:27 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 21
Message-ID: <86ecy2c5o4.fsf@linuxsc.com>
References: <87y0wjaysg.fsf@gmail.com> <87h62ys4w5.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Injection-Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2025 06:36:29 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="b047b0586914e6e160c0016b929ac37f"; logging-data="4073033"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19EgshTqbavyF+PTbx15+db/yHZuvRZ/SE="
User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.4 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:3TphIP3a0DuQElCjPvJsjIwkuUw= sha1:N/CGZ7EhVk7LJjgMH0ANMVpA/bs=
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.c:392232
James Kuyper writes:
> bart writes:
>
>> On 08/04/2025 22:46, Keith Thompson wrote:
>>
>>> bart writes:
>
> ...>> Apparently the author of the chart chose to include types
> ...>> that are
>
>>> defined by the core language, not by the library.
>>
>> So here you're finally admitteding they are a different rank.
>
> The core language and the library are equal in rank, both being
> different parts of any implementation of C.
This statement isn't exactly right. Some parts of the standard
library are available only in hosted implementations, and not in
freestanding implementations.