Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Tim Rentsch Newsgroups: comp.lang.c Subject: Re: "A diagram of C23 basic types" Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2025 21:36:27 -0700 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 21 Message-ID: <86ecy2c5o4.fsf@linuxsc.com> References: <87y0wjaysg.fsf@gmail.com> <87h62ys4w5.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Injection-Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2025 06:36:29 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="b047b0586914e6e160c0016b929ac37f"; logging-data="4073033"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19EgshTqbavyF+PTbx15+db/yHZuvRZ/SE=" User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.4 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:3TphIP3a0DuQElCjPvJsjIwkuUw= sha1:N/CGZ7EhVk7LJjgMH0ANMVpA/bs= Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.c:392232 James Kuyper writes: > bart writes: > >> On 08/04/2025 22:46, Keith Thompson wrote: >> >>> bart writes: > > ...>> Apparently the author of the chart chose to include types > ...>> that are > >>> defined by the core language, not by the library. >> >> So here you're finally admitteding they are a different rank. > > The core language and the library are equal in rank, both being > different parts of any implementation of C. This statement isn't exactly right. Some parts of the standard library are available only in hosted implementations, and not in freestanding implementations.