Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: Programming exercise/challenge
Date: Mon, 04 Jan 2021 20:04:16 -0800
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 27
Message-ID: <86czykrpvj.fsf@linuxsc.com>
References: <86wnxwkyol.fsf@linuxsc.com> <5fcbb652$0$16505$e4fe514c@textnews.kpn.nl> <86a6tvur8x.fsf@linuxsc.com> <20201230104155.77@kylheku.com> <86lfd9syfo.fsf@linuxsc.com> <20210104001549.e79025fef7062a13f4143863@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="80889085611d571f10128e03e1df8783"; logging-data="17743"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+hSa51XHW3NJ/CN4x0F2iWlSmadZa8n6g="
User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.4 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:1QiudQEA1Qx/gcATHEbW4kLsXS0= sha1:ggb+bsm6axZpZIoK13bZnH0jzYI=
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.c:158168

Anton Shepelev <anton.txt@gmail.com> writes:

> Tim Rentsch:
>
>> Well let's see.  Some people say:
>>    A 'break' statement is just a goto in disguise.
>>    A 'continue' statement is just a goto in disguise.
>>    A 'while' (or do/while) is just a goto in disguise.
>>    A 'for' is just a (syntactically sugared?) goto in disguise.
>>    A 'switch' is just a (computed?) goto in disguise.
>>    An 'if' is just a goto in disguise.
>
> The last four are not goto's in disguise in that they are
> control-flow structures of structured programming.

I don't think of any of these as gotos in disguise.  I
know some people do, but I don't.  It's like what someone
told me once about 'return' - "you can think of it as a
function call that pops the stack and sets the PC".  I
suppose people could think of it that way, but I surely
do not.

An important characteristic of "goto" is that it can go
anywhere (in the same function).  None of these constructs
have that property.  The closest might be 'switch', but
even that is limited to the controlled statement of the
switch(), and not the whole function.