Path: csiph.com!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: iso646.h
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2024 20:23:59 -0800
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 10
Message-ID: <86cytsfzj4.fsf@linuxsc.com>
References: <uokhnk$eiln$1@dont-email.me> <uol92t$l82b$3@dont-email.me> <uomjfr$sopf$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="c985c2e759848cd31734101b28e08031"; logging-data="1202644"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/K+oLyfyeUSjJ8CFbtVGCfwpZJoum3gqw="
User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.4 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:+IfQilaipuxQxbAmAiOr4pVEoAM= sha1:Ntb5uAqkFFP683sJ4nw74zQoiIg=
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.c:380670

Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> writes:

[.. using ISO646 names for logical operators ..]

> I do, if/when I do use C++ and C.  Don't you think it improves
> readability:
>
>     [example]

No, quite the contrary.