Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!nntp.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Tim Rentsch
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: function declaration without args no longer works
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2026 05:54:06 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 25
Message-ID: <86a4ukzk0h.fsf@linuxsc.com>
References: <10sl5na$5ov$1@reader1.panix.com> <20260426175044.000062ff@yahoo.com> <10slf3h$mho$3@reader1.panix.com> <10smamp$1vlj2$2@dont-email.me> <10smvq5$25a7q$2@dont-email.me> <10spm2q$5fq$1@reader1.panix.com> <10spqdr$2vs2g$1@dont-email.me> <10ss83f$c4t$1@reader1.panix.com> <10ssb73$3mum2$1@dont-email.me> <20260429112553.00006835@yahoo.com> <10ssit3$3pds0$1@dont-email.me> <10su6fn$9qef$2@dont-email.me> <86y0i4zylr.fsf@linuxsc.com> <10sv9kl$iod5$1@kst.eternal-september.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Injection-Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2026 12:54:09 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="7ff432f926fb921b7df3a70694682c9f"; logging-data="721436"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+zXkLzyqnXdKBjzBqNVB1PD1hPZ1bKQ5c="
User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.4 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:lOIYylOG/HhtPQJTbNdgyjuqUCU= sha1:ESpFMHwr8Nr9+/Ew5vq45en5+8Q=
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.c:398132
Keith Thompson writes:
> Tim Rentsch writes:
>
>> James Kuyper writes:
>>
>>> [...] for those of us
>>> using C for scientific and engineering purposes (however misguided
>>> you might think our choice of language is), support for complex
>>> math, being able to check for __STDC__IEC__ISO665__, [...]. I've
>>> known Fortran programmers who said that it was the only really
>>> good language for such purposes, who changed their mind when C99
>>> came out.
>>
>> I expect what was meant there is __STDC_IEC_559__. IEC ISO 665
>> refers to the ISO standard for the determination of moisture and
>> volatile matter content in oilseeds.
>
> C23 makes the name __STDC_IEC_559__ obsolescent. [...]
Yes, but James's posting specifically says "I've known Fortran
programmers who said that it was the only really good language
for such purposes, who changed their mind when >> C99 << came
out." It doesn't sound like he was referring to any other
C standard.