Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!nntp.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Tim Rentsch Newsgroups: comp.lang.c Subject: Re: function declaration without args no longer works Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2026 05:54:06 -0700 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 25 Message-ID: <86a4ukzk0h.fsf@linuxsc.com> References: <10sl5na$5ov$1@reader1.panix.com> <20260426175044.000062ff@yahoo.com> <10slf3h$mho$3@reader1.panix.com> <10smamp$1vlj2$2@dont-email.me> <10smvq5$25a7q$2@dont-email.me> <10spm2q$5fq$1@reader1.panix.com> <10spqdr$2vs2g$1@dont-email.me> <10ss83f$c4t$1@reader1.panix.com> <10ssb73$3mum2$1@dont-email.me> <20260429112553.00006835@yahoo.com> <10ssit3$3pds0$1@dont-email.me> <10su6fn$9qef$2@dont-email.me> <86y0i4zylr.fsf@linuxsc.com> <10sv9kl$iod5$1@kst.eternal-september.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Injection-Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2026 12:54:09 +0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="7ff432f926fb921b7df3a70694682c9f"; logging-data="721436"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+zXkLzyqnXdKBjzBqNVB1PD1hPZ1bKQ5c=" User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.4 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:lOIYylOG/HhtPQJTbNdgyjuqUCU= sha1:ESpFMHwr8Nr9+/Ew5vq45en5+8Q= Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.c:398132 Keith Thompson writes: > Tim Rentsch writes: > >> James Kuyper writes: >> >>> [...] for those of us >>> using C for scientific and engineering purposes (however misguided >>> you might think our choice of language is), support for complex >>> math, being able to check for __STDC__IEC__ISO665__, [...]. I've >>> known Fortran programmers who said that it was the only really >>> good language for such purposes, who changed their mind when C99 >>> came out. >> >> I expect what was meant there is __STDC_IEC_559__. IEC ISO 665 >> refers to the ISO standard for the determination of moisture and >> volatile matter content in oilseeds. > > C23 makes the name __STDC_IEC_559__ obsolescent. [...] Yes, but James's posting specifically says "I've known Fortran programmers who said that it was the only really good language for such purposes, who changed their mind when >> C99 << came out." It doesn't sound like he was referring to any other C standard.