Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Tim Rentsch Newsgroups: comp.lang.c Subject: Re: encapsulating directory operations Date: Fri, 23 May 2025 05:43:34 -0700 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 14 Message-ID: <868qmnv6o9.fsf@linuxsc.com> References: <100h650$23r5l$1@dont-email.me> <87ecwj1vy9.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> <100hi99$260c5$1@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Injection-Date: Fri, 23 May 2025 14:43:35 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="dbf7fe60443e86856dba10bd646cda59"; logging-data="101949"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+givURLEvyuk39PUUlnvQu/tFqu8zAz80=" User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.4 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:5lbc23yx3R+p8W59r6lS0WBqB7c= sha1:zuWyx7DR8ThN7aFXYaYcBMcX8Fc= Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.c:393565 Richard Heathfield writes: > On 20/05/2025 10:18, Keith Thompson wrote: > >> C90 will never be extended. > > And for that reason it will always be valuable. Stability > has a value all its own. C99 is just as stable as C90, and has been for well over a decade. C11 is just as stable as C90, and has been for just slightly less than a decade.