Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.c > #384587

Re: filling area by color atack safety - worst memory size

From Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com>
Newsgroups comp.lang.c
Subject Re: filling area by color atack safety - worst memory size
Date 2024-05-15 09:57 -0700
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <864jazrp18.fsf@linuxsc.com> (permalink)
References (13 earlier) <20240417004609.000010aa@yahoo.com> <86plunyj82.fsf@linuxsc.com> <20240417224126.0000727a@yahoo.com> <86a5lpxbd3.fsf@linuxsc.com> <20240420211023.000067cc@yahoo.com>

Show all headers | View raw


Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> writes:

> On Fri, 19 Apr 2024 14:59:20 -0700
> Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> wrote:
>
>> Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> writes:
>>
>>> On Wed, 17 Apr 2024 10:47:25 -0700
>>> Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> writes:
>>>>
>>>> [...]
>>>>
>>>>> Finally found the time for speed measurements.  [...]
>>>>
>>>> I got these.  Thank you.
>>>>
>>>> The format used didn't make it easy to do any automated
>>>> processing.  I was able to get around that, although it
>>>> would have been nicer if that had been easier.
>>>>
>>>> The results you got are radically different than my own,
>>>> to the point where I wonder if there is something else
>>>> going on.
>>>
>>> What are your absolute result?
>>> Are they much faster, much slower or similar to mine?
>>> Also it would help if you find out characteristics of your
>>> test hardware.
>>
>> I think trying to look at those wouldn't tell me anything
>> helpful.  Too many unknowns.  And still no way to test or
>> measure any changes to the various algorithms.
>
> Frankly, I don't understand.
> If you have troubles with testing on shared hardware then you can
> always test on the hardware that you own and has full control.
> Even if it is a little old, the trends tend to be the same.  At
> least I clearly see the same trends on my almost 12 y.o.  home PC
> and on relatively modern EPYC3.

I have put this problem aside.  It's a lot of work even if I had
a way to make substantive progress, and at present I don't.
Maybe more sometime later but for now I think suspending is the
only workable choice available.

Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Find similar


Thread

Re: filling area by color atack safety - worst memory size Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2024-04-05 17:30 +0300
  Re: filling area by color atack safety - worst memory size Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2024-04-10 19:47 -0700
    Re: filling area by color atack safety - worst memory size Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2024-04-11 15:20 +0300
      Re: filling area by color atack safety - worst memory size Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2024-04-11 21:06 -0700
      Re: filling area by color atack safety - worst memory size Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2024-04-11 21:55 -0700
      Re: filling area by color atack safety - worst memory size Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2024-04-11 22:09 -0700
        Re: filling area by color atack safety - worst memory size Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2024-04-12 11:13 +0300
          Re: filling area by color atack safety - worst memory size Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2024-04-13 08:30 -0700
      Re: filling area by color atack safety - worst memory size Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2024-04-11 22:38 -0700
      Re: filling area by color atack safety - worst memory size Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2024-04-11 22:43 -0700
      Re: filling area by color atack safety - worst memory size Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2024-04-12 11:59 -0700
        Re: filling area by color atack safety - worst memory size Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2024-04-13 20:26 +0300
          Re: filling area by color atack safety - worst memory size Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2024-04-13 10:54 -0700
            Re: filling area by color atack safety - worst memory size Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2024-04-13 23:11 +0300
        Re: filling area by color atack safety - worst memory size Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2024-04-17 10:47 -0700
          Re: filling area by color atack safety - worst memory size Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2024-04-17 22:41 +0300
            Re: filling area by color atack safety - worst memory size Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2024-04-19 14:59 -0700
              Re: filling area by color atack safety - worst memory size Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2024-04-20 21:10 +0300
                Re: filling area by color atack safety - worst memory size Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2024-04-25 17:56 +0300
                Re: filling area by color atack safety - worst memory size Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2024-05-03 18:33 +0300
                Re: filling area by color atack safety - worst memory size Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2024-05-15 09:57 -0700

csiph-web