Path: csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: Effect of CPP tags
Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2023 18:32:49 -0800
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 15
Message-ID: <8634vhu6jy.fsf@linuxsc.com>
References: <umet9d$3hir9$1@dont-email.me> <umk836$ehn5$1@dont-email.me> <iXBjN.109557$p%Mb.36381@fx15.iad> <umms18$sss0$1@dont-email.me> <87frzkvnnk.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="4ad5b29cc5222e274263b40ba81c3fd0"; logging-data="2026768"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1812TQNW1IdWPO2El78MzBA20vC/NH0gfY="
User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.4 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:ijuDCF+1J9d7GR68chC/miqwvQo= sha1:BBfebxxcY3znsy6F5+oCjaHqUPw=
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.c:379728

Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> writes:

> Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> writes:
> [...]
>
>> BTW, is 'inline' meanwhile C standard?  (I know that from C++ but
>> haven't done much C for long now.)
>
> C added inline in C99 (the 1999 edition of the ISO C standard, the same
> one that removed implicit int).
>
> I think C and C++ have subtly different semantics for inline.

I'm not a C++ expert, but as best I can tell C and C++ have
markedly different semantics for what 'inline' does.